[DL] Semantics of Number restriction: small issue (?)
Stasinos Konstantopoulos
konstant at iit.demokritos.gr
Tue Mar 13 00:07:52 CET 2012
Umberto, hi.
this seems to imply that you need a domain that is not enumerable,
otherwise you would not worry about whether
\{ y \in \Delta^I | (x,y) \in R^I \}
is enumerable or not.
But needing a non-enumerable domain sounds strange, given that enumerable
domains are sufficient for the interpretation of FOL (Löwenheim-Skolem).
Best,
Stasinos
Umberto Straccia wrote:
> More specifically, the standard set theoretic semantics of e.g.,
>
> (\geq n R)
>
> i.e.,
>
> (\geq n R)^I = \{ x | #\{ y \in \Delta^I | (x,y) \in R^I \} \geq n\}
>
> where we usually write that #S is the "cardinality of S" may be somewhat
> troubling (unless we use of continuum hypothesis, axioms of choice ...).
>
>
> If we look at the FOL rewriting of concept (\geq n R),
>
> (\geq n R)(x) = \exists_n y. R(x,y)
>
> then I suggest the equivalent set theoretic expression
>
> (\geq n R)^I = \{ x | \exists S \subset \{ y \in \Delta^I | (x,y) \in R^I
> \} such that #S = n\}
>
>
> Have a nice weekend,
>
> -Umberto Straccia
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 16:50 , Umberto Straccia wrote:
>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> it appears to me that the semantics of number restrictions concepts in
>> DLs may need a minor fix, as the notion of "the cardinal of a set" is
>> defined for sets that are equipollent to ordinal numbers only. Isn't it?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Umberto Straccia
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> | Umberto Straccia, PhD |
>> | ISTI |
>> | Italian National Research Council |
>> | Via G. Moruzzi,1 |
>> | I-56124 Pisa (PI), ITALY |
>> | ------------------------------------------------ |
>> | WWW : http://www.umberto-straccia.name |
>> | E-mail: Umberto.Straccia at isti.cnr.it |
>> / ) Phone : +39.050.315 2894 (\
>> / ) Fax : +39.050.315 3464 ( \
>> _ ( (|___ ___________________________________________ ) )_
>> (((\ \) / ) / ) / /)))
>> (\\\\ \_/ / \ \_/ ////)
>> \ / \ /
>> \ _/ \_ /
>> -----/ /---------------------------------------------\ \--------
>> / / \ \
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---
> ** You received this mail via the description logic mailing list; for
> more **
> ** information, visit the description logic homepage at
> http://dl.kr.org/. **
>
More information about the dl
mailing list