[DL] Description Logics, OWL and object-orientation

[Jeff Z. Pan]

Hi Alan,

Why not have a look at the W3C note "A Semantic Web Primer for Object-Oriented Software Developers"

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/SE/ODSD/

which might provide for you something you want to know.

Greetings,
Jeff

--
Dr. Jeff Z. Pan (http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~jpan/)
Department of Computing Science, The University of Aberdeen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Cyment" <acyment at yahoo.com>
To: <dl at dl.kr.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 7:27 PM
Subject: [DL] Description Logics, OWL and object-orientation

> Hi all,
>  I'm relatively new to DL and my question might sound
> a bit naive, but here it goes: is it OK for me to say
> that, for a given application, "I chose DL as the
> knowledge representation formalism. I first tried an
> OWL-based implementation, but later opted for an
> object-oriented one (using C# objects and classes for
> representing concepts and instances)". Does it make
> sense? Or am I making a conceptual mistake here?
> Thanks in advance for your help...
> 
> Cheers,
> Alan
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> ---
> **  You received this mail via the description logic mailing list; for more  **
> **  information, visit the description logic homepage at http://dl.kr.org/.  **
>