<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear Olivier, in general inferred
statements are regarded as "native" ones, so that they partecipate
in the executions of the query. I personally used just pellet as
reasoning engine, and ARQ to provide the sparql endpoint. However,
you may use a faster reasoner if the constructs in your ontology
falls in some specific fragments (see EL++ for example).<br>
<br>
Hope it helps,<br>
Cristiano Longo<br>
<br>
On 14/08/2013 00:53, Olivier Austina wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABiPNhYgX9wH_oF7049-HSWx1=Q+oc9v+9ojtf6V5nMg+=NSnw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Hi All,<br>
<br>
</div>
I would like to have a feedback about using a semantic web
reasoner over OWL ontology of Question Answering System. The
system use SPARQL as query language. Initially the reasoner is
not supposed to be used. But it seems to enhance the system.<br>
<br>
How to put them together and which free reasoner is
recommended? Thanks.<br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Regards<br>
Olivier<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">---
** You received this mail via the description logic mailing list; for more **
** information, visit the description logic homepage at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://dl.kr.org/">http://dl.kr.org/</a>. **
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>